Featured Posts
- Facebook Loses Reexaminations of Pragmatus’ Patents
- How is Reexamination Treating Round Rock Research?
- Reexamination has not Saved Apple against MobileMedia Patents, So Far
- What is an “Involved Application” in IPR Practice?
- Apple Victorious over Affinity Labs of Texas’ Portable Audio Player Patent
- Think IP Strategy Offers 2011 News Almanac
- An Update on Oracle’s Infringement Case against Google
- PTO Requests Public Comment on Proposed Rules for AIA Post-Issuance Proceedings
- Microsoft-i4i, Oracle-Google & VirnetX-Apple-Cisco Updates
- Oracle Patent to Emerge from Reexamination
- VirnetX again Sues for Infringement, and again Faces Reexaminations
- How Strong are Google’s Requests for Reexamination of the Lodsys Patents?
- PTO Board Sides with NVIDIA on Two Rambus “Barth I” Patents
- Oracle ‘520 Moves toward Confirmation in Reexamination
- Google Gets Mixed Result against Oracle’s Seventh Patent
- Did Google Request Reexamination of Lodsys Patents?
- Two Updates
- Oracle v. Google Android® Update
- Rambus Wins Limited Exclusion Order at ITC against NVIDIA, despite Pending Reexaminations
- 最初が肝心：不備のない再審査請求書を作成するために
- That’s My Patent You’re Reexamining…
- “Why Wait for Oppositions?” by Scott Daniels, 47 IDEA 343 (Law Review of Franklin Pierce Law School)
- The Basics
Noteworthy Links
- "The Interplay between Reexaminations, Preliminary Injunctions and Stays of Litigation" - by Dennis Crouch at PATENTLYO.COM
Favorite Patent Blogs
- All Things Pros
- CAFC Alert
- FDA Law Blog
- IPWatchdog
- Patent Docs
- Patently-O
- PLI Patent Law Practice Center
- Think IP Strategy
- US Patent Post-Grant Opposition
Recent Requests
PTO Statistics
Karaoke Patents to be Reexamined
| December 1, 2009
The PTO announced today that it has ordered reexamination of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,488,508 and 6,702,585, for information distribution systems in video games, particularly karaoke video games. The ‘508 and ‘585 patents are owned by ADC Technology Inc. of Nagoya, Japan, and are the subject of the litigation ADC v. Microsoft.
The reexaminations were requested by Microsoft, who asserted that each of four references raised a substantial new question of patentability for the ‘508 patent, and that each of three references raised a substantial new question of patentability for the ‘585 patent. The PTO found, however, that not all the references were actually prior art, and limited the reexaminations to Sanyo JP 01-289221 and Bush ‘863 patent.
Neither reference was before the examiner in the original prosecution.
The law suit between ADC and Microsoft was stayed July 10, 2009, by stipulation of the parties, pending resolution of the present reexaminations.
(December 1, 2009 – Update)
The PTO announced today that it has ordered an ex parte reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 6,875,021 which is owned by ADC Technology and entitled INTERACTIVE COMMUNICATION SYSTEM FOR COMMUNICATING GAME AND KARAOKE SOFTWARE.
The ‘021 patent is the subject of ADC’s sued Microsoft and Nintendo for infringement. As we previously reported, that suit has been stayed pending resolution of the reexaminations for the ‘508 and ‘585 patents.
The request was filed by Nintendo and relies upon a prior art reference that was not before the examiner in the original prosecution.
