Featured Posts
- Facebook Loses Reexaminations of Pragmatus’ Patents
- How is Reexamination Treating Round Rock Research?
- Reexamination has not Saved Apple against MobileMedia Patents, So Far
- What is an “Involved Application” in IPR Practice?
- Apple Victorious over Affinity Labs of Texas’ Portable Audio Player Patent
- Think IP Strategy Offers 2011 News Almanac
- An Update on Oracle’s Infringement Case against Google
- PTO Requests Public Comment on Proposed Rules for AIA Post-Issuance Proceedings
- Microsoft-i4i, Oracle-Google & VirnetX-Apple-Cisco Updates
- Oracle Patent to Emerge from Reexamination
- VirnetX again Sues for Infringement, and again Faces Reexaminations
- How Strong are Google’s Requests for Reexamination of the Lodsys Patents?
- PTO Board Sides with NVIDIA on Two Rambus “Barth I” Patents
- Oracle ‘520 Moves toward Confirmation in Reexamination
- Google Gets Mixed Result against Oracle’s Seventh Patent
- Did Google Request Reexamination of Lodsys Patents?
- Two Updates
- Oracle v. Google Android® Update
- Rambus Wins Limited Exclusion Order at ITC against NVIDIA, despite Pending Reexaminations
- 最初が肝心:不備のない再審査請求書を作成するために
- That’s My Patent You’re Reexamining…
- “Why Wait for Oppositions?” by Scott Daniels, 47 IDEA 343 (Law Review of Franklin Pierce Law School)
- The Basics
Noteworthy Links
- "The Interplay between Reexaminations, Preliminary Injunctions and Stays of Litigation" - by Dennis Crouch at PATENTLYO.COM
Favorite Patent Blogs
- All Things Pros
- CAFC Alert
- FDA Law Blog
- IPWatchdog
- Patent Docs
- Patently-O
- PLI Patent Law Practice Center
- Think IP Strategy
- US Patent Post-Grant Opposition
Recent Requests
PTO Statistics
Correction
| June 30, 2010
In our Practice Note of June 28, we cited a new Federal Register notice allowing patentees to attack a finding of an SNQ by an appeal to the Board.
We should have added that such an appeal is available for ex parte reexamination, but not inter partes reexamination. See 35 U.S.C. § 312(c).
Category: PTO Board
Subscribe | 登録
Search
Recent Posts
- The Patent Office Can Commiserate With the ITC In Administrative Procedure Act Woes (8/8/14)
- APJs Confirm a Deposition Protocol (7/25/14)
- A Likely Uphill Battle for Synopsys In Suit Against The Patent Office (6/13/14)
- Scope of Live Testimony in Final IPR Hearings (6/4/14)
- Terminal Disclaimer does not Change Claim Construction Standard, at least not in the Final Stages of an Inter Partes Review (5/28/14)
Archives
Categories
- Broadened Claims
- CAFC
- Claim Construction
- Covered Business Method Patent
- Discovery
- Estoppel
- Evidence
- Featured
- General
- Injunctions
- Inter Partes Reexamination
- Inter Partes Review
- Interferences
- Intervening Rights
- ITC
- Legislation
- New Filings
- New Standards
- Petitions
- Post-Grant Review
- Preliminary Injunction
- Press Releases
- Prosecution Bar
- Protective Order
- PTO Board
- Real Party in Interest
- Reexamination Interview
- Reexamination Requests
- Reissue
- Review Requests
- Rules
- SNQ
- Stays/District Courts
- Uncategorized
- 日本語で読む